European HomeParliaments, 5th round

Does Europe’s Democracy need a fundamental update?5th round of the European HomeParliaments. Citizens in 17 EU countries discussed three concrete reform proposals to improve and strengthen Europe’s democracy. 16 EU politicians from six parties respond to the participants’ wishes and ideas.

These were the HomeParliaments 2022

From 29 January to 03 April 2022, around 600 people in small, private groups in 17 EU countries discussed whether Europe’s democracy needs a fundamental update. More than half of the discussions took place in analogue form. The rest digital.

Numerous HomeParliaments also took place in cross-border teams. . Thereby, the HomeParliaments made a concrete contribution to the cross-border European dialogue. Either people were matched to each other by a matching process or the participants encouraged their acquaintances from other countries to get involved.

In May and June 2022, 16 EU politicians will take a position on the voting results

These politicians react live to the results.
Discuss with them!

Greens / EFA
03.05.2022
Franziska Brantner

Franziska Brantner

Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield

Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield

Results of the 5th round

"Does Europe's Democracy need a fundamental update?

94.8 percentof the European HomeParliamentarians, after discussing the various aspects, were in favour of Europe’s democracy needing a fundamental update.

p
590 participants
400 results received
73 approvals
3 abstentions
1 Rejection

Should the principle of unanimity in the Council of the European Union be abolished and replaced by qualified majority voting?

Average: 7,4

The most important argument for abolishing the principle of unanimity is the increased capacity to act.which can result from it. Without the requirement for unanimity, decisions can be made more quickly and decisively – an advantage, especially in times of crisis. The abolition of the veto creates confidence in the EU’s ability to act.

The most important counter-argument mentioned was the risk of power imbalances between large and small states. Smaller EU member states could feel left out. Therefore, the unanimity principle safeguards national sovereignty and independence.

"Should a representative citizens' council advise the EU institutions on fundamental decisions?"

Average: 5,6

Most participants agree that a representative citizens’ council creates proximity and can strengthen trust in European democracy.

The most common argument among both the hesitant and the enthusiastic questions the criteria for such a measure. For instance, participants argued that the selection process should be carefully defined and not all issues should be presented to the citizens’ committee.

Furthermore, the participants feared that the citizens’ councils – if they have more than just an advisory function – would enter into direct competition with the European Parliament. or that this would place high demands on the citizens involved. Participants also stressed that citizens’ councils should be protected from external influences and should not become thetarget of lobbying.

Should the European Parliament be able to propose and initiative its own legislation in addition to the EU Commission?

Average: 7,5

The main argument put forward by those in favor of the right of initiative was that it would strengthen European democracy. By granting the European Parliament the right, its role in the power structure of the EU would be substantially strengthened. This has the direct consequence of giving European decisions greater legitimacy. Moreover, the “royal right” of a people’s representation carries a strong symbolism.

Critics of the right of initiative for the European Parliament point to a more difficult and complex path to lawmaking. Duplicate competences would not only lengthen procedures, but also weaken the influence of the EU Commission. Critics underline that the distribution of power between the institutions is crucial and already see a well-functioning process in the current configuration.

Portraits of our dialogue partners of the 5th round

Katarina Barley

S&D
Germany

Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield

Greens / EFA
France

Nicola Beer

Renew Europe
Germany

Martin Schirdewan

GUE / NGL
Germany

Show all participating politicians

Join in!

Sign up here and we will inform you about news on the European HomeParliaments.

Register here for the next round of the European HomeParliaments. Look forward to even more discussions across Europe and new possibilities in creating diverse discussion groups.

Until the next round, you will receive regular updates and information about our webinars with top EU politicians. We are also planning to involve you in choosing the topics for the next round.

About us

Pulse of Europe is an independent citizens’ initiative above party lines founded in Frankfurt am Main in 2016. Our aim is to make the European idea visible and audible. We want to make a contribution to ensuring that a united, democratic Europe continues to exist in the future, in which respect for human dignity, the rule of law, free thought and action, tolerance and respect are the natural foundations of the community.

A project by

Pulse of Europe e.V.

Funded by

Supported by

Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung

Supported by

Democracy International

openPetition

Pulse of Europe e.V.

Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung

Democracy International

openPetition